Casas pleads guilty to 2 counts involving child porn

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Cassville man enters plea agreement for 15-25 years in prison

A Cassville man facing federal child pornography charges recently entered an agreement and changed his pleas from not guilty to guilty, settling to two federal counts stemming from a superseding indictment on July 22, 2014.

Matthew Casas, 26, of Cassville, pleaded guilty to distributing child pornography, a class C felony, and possessing child pornography with an intent to distribute, a class C felony. The plea agreement means the United States Attorney's Office for the Western District of Missouri dismissed one of the three counts against him, a class B felony charge of sexual exploitation of children.

For pleading guilty to distributing child pornography, Casas faces 5-20 years in prison, a $250,000 fine, no less than five years to a lifetime of supervised release and a $100 mandatory special assessment per felony count of conviction, which must be paid in full at the time of sentencing.

For pleading guilty to possessing child pornography, Casas faces no more than 10 years in prison, a $250,000 fine, no less than five years to a lifetime of supervised release and a $100 mandatory special assessment per felony count of conviction, which must be paid in full at the time of sentencing.

Casas' plea was entered in the courtroom of District Judge M. Douglas Harpool, and his case has been transferred to District Judge Stephen Bough for sentencing. A sentencing hearing date has not yet been determined.

According to court documents, however, Casas and the Attorney's Office have agreed to a range of punishment.

"In exchange for the government dismissing [the sexual exploitation of children charge] of the superseding indictment, and in recognition of the impact a trial could have upon his family members, [Casas] and the government have agreed to a sentence of not less than 15 years and not more than 25 years," the plea agreement said. "The defendant and the government respectfully request the court consider that range of punishment when imposing a sentence."

The document also states the guidelines are advisory in nature, and the court may impose a sentence either less than or greater than the range given. Any sentence of imprisonment will also not allow for parole.

Casas was originally indicted on April 1, 2014, on the two charges to which he has now pleaded guilty. The superseding indictment on July 22, 2014, tacked on the class B felony charge of sexual exploitation of children, which has now been dropped as part of the plea deal.

The complaint against Casas was filed in March of 2014 by Brian Martin, former task force officer with the Southwest Missouri Cyber Crimes Task Force.

According to a report released by Martin, Casas had rented a smart TV and allegedly left child pornography stored on the device's memory. Law enforcement officers reviewed the images on the set, which the report said were believed to be homemade and created by a Kodak Easy Share camera. The camera, two cell phones and a laptop computer were then seized by authorities.

Casas is also accused of loading a number of images onto Facebook and Flickr websites. The report said those were numerous images known to be commercially available and actively traded among child pornography collectors and viewers.

Task forces officers, aided by members of the Cassville Police Department and the Barry County Sheriff's Department, executed a search warrant at Casas' home on Feb. 28, 2014. According to Martin's report, Casas took a considerable amount of time to answer the door, as officers observed he was in the home. Casas opened the door as officers were preparing to force entry.

During an initial interview in a task force officer's vehicle, Casas denied ever looking at child pornography. He later allegedly admitted obtaining the pornography from a coworker at Justin Boots, and that he had posted images on the Facebook and Flickr accounts. He also allegedly admitted owning an SD memory card with pornographic content, about three weeks earlier, that contained thousands of images and hundreds of movies.

View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • This guy may be guilty of totally inappropriate behavior. As an adult he should know better.

    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

    Anyone who takes away the INNOCENCE of a child is wrong. A childhood should be filled with love, caring, respect, and above all; INNOCENCE.

    - Adults should act like ADULTS.

    - An adult does not pose a child in a provocative way to be photographed.

    - An adult does not spy on a child and photograph or videotape them secretly.

    - An adult does not go online to lure, tempt, seduce, or stalk a child.

    - An adult does not inveigle a child to come with them and leave their home space.

    - An adult does not do anything sexual with a child.

    - An adult does not confuse a child about what love is. This also applies to sons, daughters, stepsons, stepdaughters, nieces, nephews, grandsons, granddaughters, or ANY child. {A child (also called a minor) is anyone under 18 years old}.

    - Photographing or videotaping any minor being sexual VIOLATES and VICTIMIZES that minor and produces "CHILD ABUSE IMAGERY" (formerly known as child porn).

    - "Child abuse imagery" is evidence of a CRIME.

    - VIEWING the crime is a CRIME.

    - And viewing the crime RE-victimizes that child.

    - And SHARING the crime is a CRIME.

    - And sharing the crime RE-victimizes that child even more.

    - Even VIEWING a "sexual selfie" of a minor is a CRIME. (photos AND videos)

    - And viewing the crime RE-victimizes that child.

    - And SHARING the crime is a CRIME.

    - And sharing the crime RE-victimizes that child even more.

    You DON'T have the RIGHT to violate the privacy, chastity, and dignity of a child.

    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

    I am old and wise. I am retired and a philanthropist. I hope and pray to reach the conscience of the pedophile out there... Our desires don't force us to act. We are free to choose our own course of action... Maybe I can prevent a child from being exploited or even sexually assaulted today. I wrote this methodized and perspicuous comment about crime because I am combining different things that people in law enforcement have said about this scourge, and I am using my English degree to spell it out from beginning to end, so those few bad people can read it. If I can save one child, I have done a good deed. :-)

    (Also, this is not reaction formation. I am doing this because I was sexually abused between age 7 and 9. He was very kind and loving and it confused me as to what love really was supposed to be.)

    I hope this is posted on the wall of every police station, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC), the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force (ICAC), the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), Project Safe Childhood, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), Australian Federal Police (AFP), Joint Anti Child Exploitation Team (JACET), United States Marshals Service (USMS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), United States Secret Service (USSS), the European Police Office (Europol), and the International Criminal Police Organization (ICPO or INTERPOL).

    -- Posted by EdStraker on Wed, Mar 11, 2015, at 5:20 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: