Bill may change state's motorcycle helmet law

Wednesday, January 7, 2015

Barry County sheriff against House proposal

A new State House bill is making its way through the General Assembly and could allow motorcycle riders who are 18 and older to not have to wear a helmet in Missouri.

"I believe if you are riding a motorcycle, you ought to have a helmet," said Mick Epperly, Barry County sheriff.

If you get thrown off of a motorcycle, chances of hitting your head are real high, Epperly said. The helmet protects the rider's head just like football players wear helmets to protect their heads.

On Dec. 24, 2014, recently-elected State Rep. Shane Roden, R-Cedar Hill, pre-filed House Bill 310, requiring only motorcycle or motor tricycle passengers and operators under 18 to wear helmets.

As of Dec. 30, 2014, 154,830 motorcycles and motor tricycles were registered in the state of Missouri, and 1,163 were registered in Barry County, said Michelle Gleba, director of communications at the Missouri Department of Revenue.

Bob Whitescarver, who lives outside of Cassville, said he wears a helmet when he rides any one of his 15 motorcycles, but he thinks the choice should be his decision and not be made by people who do not ride motorcycles.

Whitescarver, 73, said he has been going to the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally in South Dakota for the last 10 years, and he has been riding motorcycles since 1956. The rally draws about 600,000 riders.

"If somebody is coming from the South going up to Sturgis, they avoid the state of Missouri," he said. "They go in through Arkansas and up Kansas. They will avoid this state because it requires a helmet because they can ride through these other states that don't require it.

"My point there is, along the way they are stopping and buying gas, they are getting meals, and they avoid the state of Missouri. We are actually missing the revenue."

If passed, the bill could take effect Aug. 28.

Comments
View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • There definitely are pros and cons of the mandatory helmet law. Statistics show that more than 50% of the motorcyclists do not wear helmets if the law is not mandatory. Leaving the decision to choice maybe good from the point of view of earning revenue but this might increase the number of motorcycle fatalities. A survey conducted by an online motorcycle dealer, Clandes Motards - www.clandesmotards.net, shows that almost 75% of the times lives get saved because the motorcyclist was wearing a helmet. It is therefore seen how important accessory a helmet is. Passing an optional helmet law, in my opinion, is not the right way to earn revenues.

    -- Posted by eddiewallace on Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 11:10 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: